Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782838›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Miniature brain encodes optomotor response behavior in tiny thrips.

Tomer Urca, Fritz-Olaf Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomer UrcaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of biological Sciences University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 3, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Fritz-Olaf LehmannDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of biological Sciences University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 3, 18059 Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniaturization of insects requires a reduction and simplification of morphological and physiological systems. An extreme example is the visual system of tiny thrips that has only 120 ommatidia and a tiny brain for image processing. To investigate the significance of this reduction, our study combines measurements of optical properties of ommatidia using micro-tomography with a behavioral assay on optomotor response and numerical analyses on the movement detector. We found large interommatidial and photoreceptor acceptance angles of ∼18°. During stimulation by a rotating stripe pattern, thrips walk on circular paths to compensate for retinal slip. We estimated ∼3.5 Hz stimulus temporal frequency for maximum optomotor response and ∼41 ms time constant for the low-pass filter of the movement detector. Our study suggests that even animals with an extreme miniaturization of their sensory systems maintain optomotor behaviors and possibly neural coding strategies of visual information that are typical for larger insects.

Indexed as

Developmental neuroscienceMolecular neuroscienceSystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41782838
PMCPMC12955214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.