ArticleiScience2026
Bipolar cell networks underlying steady-state intensity encoding in intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) encode ambient light intensity at steady-state and drive physiology even in the absence of melanopsin, but the synaptic basis of such encoding remains unclear. Using ultrastructural reconstructions, we mapped specific bipolar cell (BC) types and synapses conveying photoreceptor input to ipRGCs. Functional imaging showed BC glutamate release onto ipRGCs encodes intensity at steady-state, though release onto other RGCs also exhibits such encoding. Disrupting inhibition on BCs spared intensity-encoding release at ipRGC strata but reduced it elsewhere, consistent with inhibition shifting BC dynamic range. Recording postsynaptic excitatory currents showed that ipRGCs better preserve BC-derived intensity encoding than conventional RGCs. Thus, ipRGCs receive excitation from selected, inhibition-resistant BCs whose steady-state release encodes intensity. This, together with the enhanced preservation of postsynaptic intensity encoding, ensures reliable ipRGC intensity signaling independent of visual contrast to drive physiology and behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.