ArticleiScience2026
"Natural" fibers in lakes: A 150-year sedimentary perspective on persistence.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural fiber textiles, such as cotton, are widely marketed as greener, biodegradable materials within the fashion and textiles industry. However, contemporary environmental assessments of whole (plastic and non-plastic) textile fiber pollution regularly find natural, not plastic, fibers dominate environmental samples. Here we combine palaeolimnological, archival, and forensic science methodologies to evaluate long-term fiber preservation in sediments. We recover individual textile fibers from a unique 150-year lake sediment record from Rudyard lake, Staffordshire, UK. Between c.1876 and c.1979, all bar two fibers recovered from this sediment were natural. After c.1979, fiber accumulation rates increase, driven primarily by an increase in cotton accumulation. These data challenge assumptions of natural fiber biodegradability and add to the technofossil record of historic human activity. We conclude that there is a pressing need to reconsider whether natural textile fibers are as benign as is largely assumed, particularly in pursuit of plastic alternatives for fashion and textiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.