ArticleRadiology advances2026
Deep reinforcement learning for automatic anatomic CT landmark localization in Stanford Type B aortic dissection.
Article in Radiology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Long-term aortic dissection monitoring requires consistent, landmark-based measurements over time. Purpose: To evaluate the performance of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents for the detection of anatomic landmarks in patients with Stanford Type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Materials and Methods: This is an international retrospective study of 396 CT angiography scans of patients with TBAD from 9 participating sites (mean age 57.6 years ± 13.7/[SD]; 236 male, 160 female). Aortic landmarks, including the aortic annulus and 8 aortic branch vessels, were manually labeled. Additionally, interobserver variability data were collected between 2 observers for 30 scans. DRL agents were trained independently for each landmark with the manual labels serving as the reference standard. Unique landmark locations were obtained from (1) single agents' predictions and (2) clusters of landmark predictions using the DBSCAN clustering algorithm. The performance was analyzed based on distance metrics (mean, median, quantiles) and failure rates, defined as a distance error of more than 10 mm. Interobserver variability data were analyzed with a pairwise Wilcoxon test. Results: On the internal test set, DRL single agents predicted landmark locations with median errors of 2.7 (95% CI, 2.2-3.3) mm and 4.8% failure rate. Cluster-based predictions resulted in a median error of 2.5 (95% CI, 2.4-2.7) mm and 4.0% failure rate. Pooled over all landmarks, cluster-based predictions outperformed single-agent predictions ( Conclusion: Single-agent and cluster-based DRL predict aortic landmarks in patients with TBAD with high accuracy and precision, comparable to the variability between human observers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.