Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782809›Full record

ArticleAPL bioengineering2026

Computational modeling of human vagus nerve stimulation with three-dimensional fascicular morphology.

Daniel P Marshall, Aniruddha R Upadhye, Ozge N Buyukcelik, Andrew J Shoffstall, Warren M Grill, Nicole A Pelot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APL bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel P MarshallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-4542
Aniruddha R UpadhyeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9303-5872
Ozge N BuyukcelikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6550-0685
Andrew J ShoffstallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0881-2180
Nicole A PelotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2844-0190

Funding

RECONSTRUCTING VAGAL ANATOMY75N98022C00018 · OD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SHOFFSTALL, ANDREW · 2022 to 2024
$15.8M
Modeling Activation and Block of Autonomic Nerves for Analysis and DesignOT2OD025340 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2017 to 2021
$5.9M
NIH HHS 75N98022C00018NIH HHS OT2 OD025340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implanted vagus nerve stimulation is FDA-approved to treat epilepsy, depression, and stroke sequelae and is under development for other disorders such as heart failure and rheumatoid arthritis. Anatomically realistic computational models enable the design of electrodes and stimulation parameters that activate nerve fibers that mediate therapeutic responses, and avoid activating fibers that cause side effects. Conventional modeling techniques assume constant longitudinal morphology, extruding a single cross section to define the three-dimensional nerve geometry. However, recent imaging data showed that human vagus nerves have extensive fascicle splitting and merging along their length. Therefore, we developed a pipeline to simulate true three-dimensional (true-3D) models of peripheral nerve stimulation from segmentations of micro-computed tomography imaging. We implemented models of n = 4 human vagus nerves and systematically evaluated extrusion vs true-3D model responses to electrical stimulation across population dose-response relationships, fiber-specific thresholds, recruitment order, and spatial selectivity. Despite the complex morphology of the human vagus nerve, extrusion models replicated the true-3D neural responses if: (1) the nerve morphology was deformed to a circular cross section, as occurs with chronic cuff implants, and (2) the extruded cross section was centered under the depolarizing electrode contact. Our pipeline provides a foundation for advanced modeling of peripheral nerve stimulation and the design of more selective stimulation therapies.

Identifiers

PMID41782809
PMCPMC12956375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.