ArticleCureus2026
Accidental Administration of Anti-D Immunoglobulin to an Rh(D)-Positive Neonate: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-D immunoglobulin (RhIg) is administered to Rh(D)-negative mothers to prevent alloimmunization in Rh(D)-incompatible pregnancies, and is contraindicated in Rh(D)-positive individuals. Herein, we report a case of accidental intramuscular administration of RhIg to an Rh(D)-positive neonate. A female infant was born at 39 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 2,432 g. Shortly after birth, one vial of RhIg (250 μg), which should have been administered to the mother, was mistakenly injected into the neonate. The infant was transferred to our neonatal intensive care unit at one day of age for careful observation. On admission, the infant was in good general condition without pallor or jaundice. Laboratory tests revealed a hemoglobin level of 16.9 g/dL and a total bilirubin level of 4.54 mg/dL. The direct Coombs test was positive (2+). During hospitalization and subsequent outpatient follow-up, hemoglobin and bilirubin levels remained within the reference ranges, and neither phototherapy nor transfusion was required. The direct Coombs test remained positive for approximately three months, after which it spontaneously became negative. Although theoretical concerns exist regarding hemolysis after RhIg administration in Rh(D)-positive neonates, severe hemolytic complications were not observed in this case. Based on our case and previous reports, careful short-term observation followed by outpatient follow-up appears to be a reasonable management strategy for similar accidental administrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.