Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782785›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Understanding Factors Motivating Trainees to Pursue a Career in Radiology: An Interview Study.

Rebekah Brawley, Sanjana Kumar, Jonathan Kibble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebekah BrawleyMedicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.
Sanjana KumarMedicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.
Jonathan KibbleMedicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional qualitative study investigated the factors that motivate trainees to pursue diagnostic radiology and examined how perceptions of the specialty may evolve across different stages of medical training. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of three medical students, three PGY-5 diagnostic radiology residents, and four board-certified radiologists. Thematic analysis was applied to the transcripts to identify recurring themes and subthemes across participant groups. Across all training levels, participants consistently cited the intellectual rigor of radiology and a strong passion for lifelong learning as key motivators. The interdisciplinary nature of the field and its central role in patient care were highly valued. Interviewees emphasized the importance of early exposure, mentorship, and addressing persistent misconceptions to increase interest in radiology. The decision to pursue the specialty was described as a reflective process involving alignment with personal values, strengths, and career goals. Choosing radiology requires introspection and a clear understanding of one's professional identity and aspirations. While individual journeys vary, shared themes suggest that targeted interventions, particularly early curricular integration and accessible mentorship, may foster interest and reduce barriers to entry. These findings offer actionable insights for medical educators seeking to support students in exploring radiology as a viable and fulfilling career.

Indexed as

medical educationmedical student specialty choicemotivation factorsradiology medical educationspecialty choice influencers

Identifiers

PMID41782785
PMCPMC12953042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.