Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782781›Full record

ArticleEuropean oral research2026

Performance evaluation of deep learning models for overbite classification on cephalometric radiographs.

Sultan Büşra Ay Kartbak, Mehmet Birol Özel, Muhammet Çakmak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sultan Büşra Ay KartbakKocaeli University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Kocaeli Turkiye.
Mehmet Birol ÖzelKocaeli University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Kocaeli Turkiye.
Muhammet ÇakmakSinop University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Computer Engineering, Sinop Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different deep learning algorithms in classifying overbite based on lateral cephalometric radiographic images. Materials and methods: This study was conducted using lateral cephalometric radiographs of 1062 patients. Overbite values were measured via WebCeph, and the radiographs were categorized into three groups (Overbite 1, Overbite 2, and Overbite 3) based on cephalometric measurements. Six deep learning models (ResNet101, DenseNet201, EfficientNetV2-B0, ConvNetBase, EfficientNet-B0, and a Hybrid Model) were employed to classify the radiographs. Model performance was evaluated using various metrics, including F1-score, accuracy, precision, recall, mean absolute error (MAE), Cohen's Kappa coefficient, and area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC). Additionally, confusion matrices and Grad-CAM visualizations were generated to further interpret the models' decision-making processes. Results: All deep learning models employed in this study achieved classification accuracies exceeding 85%. Among them, the EfficientNet B0 and Hybrid models yielded the highest accuracy rates, whereas the ConvNetBase model demonstrated the lowest performance in terms of classification accuracy. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the potential of deep learning models to accurately and reliably classify cephalometric overbite categories without the need for conventional cephalometric analysis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecephalometrydeep learningorthodontic assessmentoverbite

Identifiers

PMID41782781
PMCPMC12954875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.