ArticleEuropean oral research2026
Does the chin projection and sella point position affect the W angle reliability?
Article in European oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of the Sella (S) and G points used in the W angle for different types of malocclusions. Materials and methods: Pretreatment cephalometric radiographs of 700 individuals aged 15 to 25 years, who began orthodontic treatment between 2019 and 2024, were randomly selected from the archives of the Department of Orthodontics at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University. After applying exclusion criteria, 570 radiographs (290 females, 280 males) were included in the study. These radiographs were divided into three groups based on ANB and Wits values: Class I (C1) (n = 103), Class II (C2) (n = 178), and Class III (C3) (n = 111). Each group was further divided into nine subgroups according to chin projection (low [a1], normal [a2], high [a3]), the vertical position of the sella point (low [b1], normal [b2], high [b3]), and the sagittal position of the sella point (low [c1], normal [c2], high [c3]). The vertical position of the sella point was determined by calculating its distance from the FH plane, while its sagittal position was assessed by measuring the distance of its projection onto the FH plane relative to the orbitale point. Chin projection was determined using the Pg-NB measurement. Results: Statistical analysis showed that chin projection was positively correlated with the W angle in all subgroups (p < 0.001). The sagittal position of the sella point did not significantly affect the W angle in any of the classes. However, the vertical position of the sella point was positively correlated with the W angle only in the subgroups with high vertical values (C1b3, p = 0.002; C2b3, p < 0.001; C3b3, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both chin projection and the vertical position of the sella point were found to influence the W angle, whereas the sagittal position of the sella point did not have a significant effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.