ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2026
Assessing Burn Depth by Indocyanine Green Angiography: A Systematic Review and Algorithm for Clinical Use.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery in acute settings: state-of-the art.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experienced burn surgeons correctly assess burn depth in only 60-75% of cases. Various strategies are available to define the degree of burn, ranging from clinical observation (the most common) to biopsy and subsequent histological analysis. Among these, indocyanine green angiography (ICG) is gaining popularity for its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to explore the utility of ICG as a tool for evaluating the extent and severity of burns, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes in burn care. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library through February 2025 using the search terms [ICG OR indocyanine green] AND [burn]. Article selection was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. The initial search yielded 201 results, of which 10 articles met inclusion criteria (3 on animal models, 7 on human subjects, involving 122 patients overall). Preclinical studies demonstrated ICG's ability to distinguish between partial- and full-thickness burns with 100% accuracy when compared to histopathology. Clinical studies confirmed improved diagnostic performance over clinical assessment alone. Optimal imaging was reported at five minutes post-injection, with evaluation recommended between days two and three post-injury. Quantitative and qualitative fluorescence analysis enabled discrimination of superficial burns, where dermal vascularization is preserved, from deep burns. This method could reduce waiting times and support early surgical decision-making. A structured clinical algorithm integrating timing, dosing, and interpretation was proposed based on literature. ICG video-angiography has shown to be an effective technique that deserves consideration in the assessment of burn patients. Further studies are needed to increase knowledge and guide its optimal clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41782773PMC12954700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.