ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
rMAP 2.0: a modular, reproducible, and scalable WDL-Cromwell-Docker workflow for genomic analysis of ESKAPEE pathogens.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in ESKAPEE pathogens ( Results: rMAP 2.0 standardizes end-to-end bacterial whole-genome analysis-read quality control, trimming, assembly and annotation, resistance/virulence/mobile-element profiling, sequence typing, pangenome inference, and phylogenetic reconstruction using containerized execution, and generates a single interactive HTML report that collates outputs for rapid review. The workflow supports fully offline execution (including BLAST searches) for data-sovereign deployments and can run on local workstations, institutional servers, and cloud backends where Docker is supported, providing a consistent execution environment without local tool installation. In a representative benchmark of 20 Enterobacterales isolates, rMAP 2.0 completed a cohort run in ∼4.5 hours on an 8-core/16-GB laptop and flagged a public record misannotated in public repository metadata (SRR9703249, reclassified from Availability and implementation: https://github.com/gmboowa/rMAP-2.0 and example workflow reports are available at: https://gmboowa.github.io/rMAP-2.0/.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.