ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Epicranial electrical stimulation improves non-navigational spatial memory in macaque monkeys.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The hippocampus and medial temporal lobe are crucial for spatial memory, and their dysfunction is linked to Alzheimer's disease (AD), with changes detectable even in preclinical stages. Recently, neuromodulation has gained interest as a potential treatment due to its beneficial effects on AD pathology and cognitive performance. However, outcomes vary significantly based on stimulation parameters and study conditions, and evidence from large animal models remains limited. Objective: To assess whether epicranial current stimulation (ECS) at 40 Hz can improve non-navigational spatial memory and hippocampal activations. Methods: Three rhesus macaques were implanted with spiral platinum electrodes bilaterally on the skull and were trained in a non-navigational spatial memory task. ECS was applied at 40 Hz or at 10 Hz and performance across multiple sessions was evaluated. We further performed ECS during fMRI to examine the spread of activations caused by ECS across the brain in a block-design experiment. Results: ECS at 40 Hz improved performance in a non-navigational spatial memory task, while 10 Hz ECS had minimal or negative effects. Concurrent ECS-fMRI showed extensive brain activations at 40 Hz, including significant hippocampal activations, which was not observed at 10 Hz. Conclusions: Our results show that ECS could be a minimally-invasive and effective approach to improve memory performance and activate the hippocampus. ECS could represent a potential treatment for patients suffering from memory impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.