ArticleInternational journal of translational medical research and public health2025
Building Real-World Evidence Infrastructure to Improve Health and Healthcare in the United States: Part III-Questions for Translational Science and Action Theory.
Article in International journal of translational medical research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Previous work in this series has introduced real-world evidence (RWE), coordinated registry networks (CRNs), and systemic, coordinated, inter-organizational networks (SCIONs) theory. The application of SCIONs theory to CRNs illuminates how their structure and function foster trust and cooperation in a network of organizations to successfully address complex problems in healthcare. This third part in the series asks questions about how SCIONs theory can benefit CRNs and how the experience of CRNs can further develop the SCIONs theory. Methods: This manuscript analyzes reciprocal relationships related to SCIONs theory and CRN practice, examining how each can be used to benefit the other. While SCIONs theory has not yet formally been used to direct the development of a CRN, future application is proposed. Conversely, we explored how the practical experiences of CRNs can inform and refine our understanding of SCIONs, including identifying areas for theoretical development and through an exploration of the current limitations of CRNs. Results: The SCIONs theory may usefully direct CRN development in key leadership areas, including increasing human capital, encouraging organizational adaptiveness, expanding institutional capacity, mobilizing political engagement, and generating cooperative behavior. CRNs, guided by SCIONs theory, can offer a pathway towards a more efficient, equitable, and learning-oriented healthcare system. A comprehensive approach proposed for CRNs may facilitate the expansion of the evaluation component in SCIONs theory. Conclusion and Implications for Translation: CRN program managers should prioritize strategic approaches that foster human capital, organizational adaptability, and institutional capacity. Government agencies may consider investments in CRN as a way to build RWE infrastructure that improves quality and efficiency of healthcare broadly. Public discourse may benefit from a clearer understanding of the role of cooperation in society to address issues that government and markets are not well suited to address. The literature on SCIONs can support the non-profit literature in the way the business literature supports the for-profit sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.