ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
A Method to Guide Pressure Selection for Programmable Pressure Valves after Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Programmable pressure valves with antisiphon/gravity devices are recommended for ventriculoperitoneal shunts. However, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage and underdrainage still frequently occur because of the lack of effective pressure regulation methods. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a method to guide valve pressure selection after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Materials and Methods: A total of 31 patients whose valve pressure was lowered for the last time after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement were enrolled in this study. Glucose solution was injected into the reservoir before and after adjustment, and the residual glucose concentration was measured 20 minutes later. Residual glucose concentrations were then compared between before and after adjustment. In vitro experiments were also conducted to simulate the flow of CSF through the shunt valve and detect the relationship between flow rate and residual glucose concentration. Results: The glucose concentration in the CSF was significantly decreased after adjusting (mean ± standard deviation, 15 ± 6.6 vs. 5.6 ± 3.1 mmol/L, respectively; Conclusion: When the residual glucose concentration is higher than 10 mmol/L, an underdrainage shunt should be considered, and when it is lower than 10 mmol/L, an appropriate pressure should be considered, which provides a reference for lowering the shunt valve pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.