Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782599›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2026

Endoscopic Diskectomy in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Samuel H Wakelin, Joseph S Hudson, Andrew D Legarreta, David J McCarthy, David K Hamilton, Vincent J Miele, Joseph C Maroon, David O Okonkwo, Nitin Agarwal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel H WakelinGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-0340
Joseph S HudsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Andrew D LegarretaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
David J McCarthyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
David K HamiltonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Vincent J MieleDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Joseph C MaroonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Nitin AgarwalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Athletes are at increased risk of lumbar disk herniation due to degenerative and traumatic factors. Prior studies have evaluated the efficacy of traditional open diskectomy in athletes; however, there is limited evidence regarding the utility of endoscopic diskectomy for athletes recovering from lumbar disk herniations. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic diskectomy in athletes with lumbar disk herniation, focusing on return to play and pain outcomes. Studies on athletes with lumbar disk herniation who underwent endoscopic diskectomy were included. Case reports and case series with fewer than 10 patients were excluded. PubMed-Medline and Ovid-Medline databases were searched, with the last search conducted in May 2024. Quality assessment/risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool for non-comparative studies. Data were synthesized using a random effects model. Meta-analyses were conducted using R software (R Core Team, 2024). Four studies with a total of 119 athletes were included. The combined return to play rate was 96% (95% CI: 90-100%), with a mean return to play time of 8.25 weeks (95% CI: 6.51-10.46 weeks). The mean differences in leg and back VAS were -68.83 (95% CI: -102.05 to -35.61) and -68.42 (95% CI: -101.45 to -35.40), respectively. Endoscopic diskectomy in athletes is associated with high return to play rates and significant pain reduction. Future studies that stratify outcomes based on the level of competition and specific endoscopic diskectomy technique are needed to fully assess the utility of endoscopic diskectomy in athletes.

Indexed as

athletesendoscopic diskectomymicroendoscopic diskectomypercutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomyreturn to play

Identifiers

PMID41782599
PMCPMC12956385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.