ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
Endoscopic Diskectomy in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Athletes are at increased risk of lumbar disk herniation due to degenerative and traumatic factors. Prior studies have evaluated the efficacy of traditional open diskectomy in athletes; however, there is limited evidence regarding the utility of endoscopic diskectomy for athletes recovering from lumbar disk herniations. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic diskectomy in athletes with lumbar disk herniation, focusing on return to play and pain outcomes. Studies on athletes with lumbar disk herniation who underwent endoscopic diskectomy were included. Case reports and case series with fewer than 10 patients were excluded. PubMed-Medline and Ovid-Medline databases were searched, with the last search conducted in May 2024. Quality assessment/risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool for non-comparative studies. Data were synthesized using a random effects model. Meta-analyses were conducted using R software (R Core Team, 2024). Four studies with a total of 119 athletes were included. The combined return to play rate was 96% (95% CI: 90-100%), with a mean return to play time of 8.25 weeks (95% CI: 6.51-10.46 weeks). The mean differences in leg and back VAS were -68.83 (95% CI: -102.05 to -35.61) and -68.42 (95% CI: -101.45 to -35.40), respectively. Endoscopic diskectomy in athletes is associated with high return to play rates and significant pain reduction. Future studies that stratify outcomes based on the level of competition and specific endoscopic diskectomy technique are needed to fully assess the utility of endoscopic diskectomy in athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.