ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: Advancing Training, Education, and Surgical Planning.
Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- OpenOR - a virtual reality framework for medical education.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Transsphenoidal Surgical Approaches to the Sellar and Parasellar Area-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) is transforming the vast field of neurosurgery by providing realistic and interactive simulations of intricate brain structures. A literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library using the keywords "virtual reality," "VR in neurosurgery," "skill development," "neurosurgical education," "patient outcome," "3D visualisation," "evolution in neurosurgery," and "simulators" was performed. The relevant articles, including RCTs, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews and narrative reviews, were considered from inception up to March 2025. This review of existing literature was conducted to explore the evolution, current applications, and future potential of VR in neurosurgery. Emerging in the early 1990s, it lacked accuracy and precision, but now in the 2020s, it provides exceptional benefits to the field. The findings highlight how VR has enhanced the neurosurgical field through various simulators, optimized strategies and planning and decision making, and improved surgical training. Students of neurosurgery can get trained through various 3D models, providing them with a realistic experience of surgical procedures. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has further refined surgical decision-making, risk evaluation, and real-time adaptability. However, various challenges exist, making VR accessibility limited. High cost, lack of numerous skilled operators, user discomfort, and no proper ethical protocols are critical hindrances that need to be addressed. VR has evolved into a crucial tool for neurosurgical innovation, although ongoing research needs to refine AI-driven models, expand accessibility, and establish standardized protocols for easy adoption across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.