Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782490›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2026

Alemtuzumab Induction in Septuagenarians Undergoing Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

David I Harriman, Alex Ng, Alan C Farney, Giuseppe Orlando, Colleen Jay, Amber Reeves-Daniel, Robert J Stratta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David I HarrimanDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-4331
Alex NgDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5650-2921
Alan C FarneyDepartment of Surgery,  Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2074-7457
Giuseppe OrlandoDepartment of Surgery,  Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-7974
Colleen JayDepartment of Surgery,  Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5824-1727
Amber Reeves-DanielDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Robert J StrattaDepartment of Surgery,  Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0143-9813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab is used as an induction agent in kidney transplantation (KT) but remains understudied in septuagenarian recipients. The study purpose was to analyze the safety and efficacy of single-dose alemtuzumab induction in septuagenarian deceased donor (DD) KT recipients.

methodsSingle center retrospective nonrandomized cohort review of septuagenarian DDKT recipients stratified by induction immunosuppression (single dose alemtuzumab versus multi-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG]). Standardized management algorithms were used, and all patients received maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus/mycophenolate/steroids.

resultsFrom November 2003 to December 2024, 359 DDKTs were performed in septuagenarian recipients with either alemtuzumab (n = 270) or ATG induction (n = 89). Donor and recipient characteristics were largely comparable between the two groups. Five-year patient (70.3% alemtuzumab versus 82.9% ATG, p = 0.054), graft (60.2% alemtuzumab versus 74.7% ATG, p = 0.04) and death-censored graft survival (80.0% alemtuzumab versus 89.1% ATG, p = 0.11) rates favored the ATG cohort.

conclusionATG induction was associated with improved survival outcomes in our cohort and may be the preferred induction agent in septuagenarians undergoing DDKT versus alemtuzumab. Given the findings of our study, caution is warranted with the use of alemtuzumab in elderly KT patients receiving triple maintenance immunosuppression.

Indexed as

AlemtuzumabGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsTissue DonorsAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedAlemtuzumabImmunosuppressive Agentsalemtuzumabdeceased donor kidney transplantelderly recipientsgraft survivalkidney transplantationpatient survivalseptuagenarians

Identifiers

PMID41782490
PMCPMC12961419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.