ArticlePsychological medicine2026
Dynamic coactivation patterns during repetitive negative thinking: A cross-sectional fMRI study.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ketamine's impact on rumination-related brain dynamics: insights from a randomized controlled fMRI trial.Translational psychiatry · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRepetitive negative thinking (RNT) and neuroticism are risk factors for internalizing psychopathology. However, their interaction has only been investigated at the self-report level, and studies elucidating their interrelationship at the neural level are lacking. We therefore investigated the interaction of trait RNT and neuroticism with respect to the dynamics of neural networks during negative self-referential processing.
methodsA sample of 110 healthy subjects reported trait RNT and neuroticism, followed by an RNT induction paradigm during fMRI. Dynamic coactivation pattern (CAP) analysis was used to identify a set of recurring coactivation patterns and to quantify their persistence and count rates. Next, the effects of trait RNT, neuroticism, and their interaction on brain dynamics were tested using regression models.
resultsNegative interactions between RNT and neuroticism were found for persistence and counts of the canonical default mode network (DMN) as well as salience network (SAL) CAP. Simple slope analysis revealed that subjects scoring high on neuroticism exhibited a negative association between trait RNT and DMN as well as canonical SAL dynamics. Furthermore, trait RNT was positively associated with persistence and count rates of a hybrid FPN+DMN coactivation state.
conclusionsOur results suggest that individuals with high neuroticism who spend more time in SAL and DMN CAPs may be less vulnerable to RNT, potentially reflecting more adaptive network configurations. Furthermore, less segregated CAPs, evident by the concurrent activation of functionally antagonistic networks (FPN+DMN), emerge more often in individuals prone to RNT, likely reflecting disrupted network interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.