ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Fidelity of Sensory Reinnervation in Peroneal and Sural Nerves to Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglia 4 and 5 After Segmental Injury to the Sciatic Nerve.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fidelity of Sensory Reinnervation in Peroneal and Sural Nerves to Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglia 4 and 5 After Segmental Injury to the Sciatic Nerve.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recovery after axotomy of a peripheral nerve is dependent on regrowth of axons from the point of injury to distal sensorimotor tissues and can be complicated by nerve branching. Little is known about regeneration of sensory axons that encounter branch points distal to injuries. The experiments reported here focused on this question and sought to assess the fidelity of sensory axon regeneration, where fidelity is defined as an axon that originally innervated a distal branch of the sciatic nerve regenerated into that same distal branch after injury, with serial retrograde labeling. Rats with segmental sciatic nerve injuries were treated with linear or branched grafts, with retrograde labels injected into the peroneal and sural branches of the sciatic nerve prior to injury and 12 weeks after. Lumbar dorsal root ganglia 4 and 5 were collected after 12 weeks and were imaged to determine the fidelity of sensory axon regeneration. Results show that the fidelity of sensory regeneration into these two branches differed by the branch and the graft type. Interestingly, the fidelity of sensory axon reinnervation was greater into the peroneal nerve, which is a mixed sensorimotor nerve, compared to the sural nerve, which is a sensory nerve. This occurred in both graft types and suggests that the fidelity of sensory regeneration is improved into mixed branches distal to the PNI compared to sensory branches and supports why regeneration of segmental branched defects may be superior using anatomically matching branched grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.