ReviewPlant communications2026
Plant P-bodies in post-transcriptional control: Composition, dynamics, and context-dependent roles.
Review in Plant communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Stress Tolerance: From Stress Perception to Phytohormonal Crosstalk and Transcriptional Regulation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Processing bodies (P-bodies, PBs) are cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein condensates that concentrate mRNA-decay and translation-repression factors. In plants, PBs share core machinery with other eukaryotes but exhibit unique, context-dependent features that distinguish them from their yeast and mammalian counterparts. These properties are shaped by direct modulation from hormonal signaling (e.g., abscisic acid [ABA]) and stress physiology, underscoring their specialized roles in adaptation. Here we synthesize plant-focused evidence on PB composition, liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly, and their coupling to decapping-dependent and co-translational decay pathways. We delineate the contexts in which PBs act as decay hotspots versus buffering sites for non-translating mRNAs, and explicitly distinguish plant findings from inferences derived from yeast/animal systems. We also integrate recent advances on post-translational modifications (e.g., mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent DCP1 phosphorylation) and RNA modifications (m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.