ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Performance, blood parameters, ruminal fermentation and microbial community of dairy cows supplemented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product from dry-off to early lactation.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dairy cows experience oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune dysfunction during the transition from dry-off to early lactation. Postbiotics such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP), consisting of nonliving microorganisms with or without their components, have beneficial effects on the production efficiency and immune function of dairy cows. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of SCFP on milk production, milk composition, ruminal fermentation, blood metabolites, oxidative status, inflammatory responses, and the ruminal microbial community in Holstein dairy cows supplemented from the day of dry-off through early lactation. Two hundred cows were blocked on the basis of parity, BCS, milk yield, and the time of dry-off and were randomly allocated to specific treatment groups within each block. The treatments included the control group (CON, n = 100) receiving basal diets with no SCFP supplementation and the SCFP group (n = 100) receiving basal diets supplemented with 19 g/d of SCFP from d -60 to 60 relative to parturition. Milk yield-monitored for all 100 cows per treatment-was tracked until d 140 postpartum. In parallel, ruminal fluid, feces, milk, and blood samples were collected from a subset of cows (n = 20/treatment) during the treatment period for further analyses. Data were analyzed via the MIXED procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc.). The results revealed that the average milk yield of dairy cows in the SCFP group was greater than that in the CON group (43.93 vs. 42.08 kg/d, P = 0.04, n = 100) during the treatment period and remained greater (41.92 vs. 39.98 kg/d, P = 0.04, n = 100) throughout the 140 d postpartum recording period. Cows fed SCFP had significantly lower serum β-hydroxybutyrate and nonesterified fatty acid concentrations than did those in the CON group. Compared with the CON group, the SCFP group presented greater levels of superoxide dismutase and lower malonaldehyde concentrations. The SCFP group also presented a greater total antioxidant capacity prepartum and higher glutathione peroxidase levels postpartum. Additionally, the SCFP group had lower concentrations of proinflammatory factors, such as IL-1β, serum amyloid A, and haptoglobin, throughout the treatment period, indicating a stronger anti-inflammatory capability. Overall, SCFP supplementation improved the ruminal environment, reduced oxidative stress and the inflammatory status, and ultimately increased milk production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.