ReviewJournal of liver cancer2026
Imaging differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma, combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: pitfalls and advances.
Review in Journal of liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate non-invasive differentiation of primary liver cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), is crucial for optimal management but challenging due to shared risk factors and overlapping imaging phenotypes. While the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M effectively captures the classic targetoid appearance of large duct type iCCA, the small duct type frequently exhibits HCC-mimicking non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement and non-peripheral washout, potentially compromising diagnostic specificity. Furthermore, cHCC-CCA presents a formidable diagnostic dilemma, existing on a continuous imaging spectrum that reflects its histologic dominance. This continuous imaging spectrum not only blurs radiologic distinctions but also complicates tissue sampling, limiting the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies and highlighting the risk of misclassification. To enhance diagnostic clarity, this review highlights their key imaging hallmarks: while HCC typically shows non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and non-peripheral washout, large duct iCCA displays a classic targetoid appearance with rim APHE and progressive central enhancement. Conversely, small duct iCCA often mimics HCC, and cHCC-CCA exhibits a variable spectrum depending on its predominant histologic component. Ultimately, overcoming these diagnostic pitfalls requires a rigorous, multidisciplinary approach that synthesizes imaging findings, serologic tumor markers, and clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.