Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Azamat A TotikovLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1236-631X
Andrey A TomarovskyLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-704X
Polina L PerelmanLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0982-5100
Tatiana M BulyonkovaYouth Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk 628011, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-2001
Natalia A SerdyukovaLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0409-1371
Aliya R YakupovaDivision of Evolutionary Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Planegg 82152, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-0864
David MohrGenetic Resources Core Facility, Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2198-3822
Daniel W FoersterLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Berlin 10315, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6934-0404
Jose Horacio Grau JipoulouSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Center for Species Survival, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5328-3652
Violetta R BeklemishevaLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-4143
Mikhail SidorovInstitute of Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS, Yakutsk 677000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0333-261X
Inês MirandaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto, Vairão 4485-661, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4773-2877
Liliana FareloCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto, Vairão 4485-661, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4985-3592
Alexei V AbramovLaboratory for Theriology, Zoological Institute RAS, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9709-4469
Victor V PanovInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-2985
Elena BalanovskaLaboratory of Human Population Genetics, Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-8300
Nikolay CherkasovCentre for Computational Biology, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-0200
Alan F ScottGenetic Resources Core Facility, Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9706-7839
José Melo-FerreiraCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto, Vairão 4485-661, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4473-1908
Innokentiy M OkhlopkovInstitute of Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS, Yakutsk 677000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-5216
Anna ZhukInstitute of Applied Computer Science, ITMO University, St. Petersburg 197101, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-9533
Klaus-Peter KoepfliSmithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-0676
Alexander S GraphodatskyLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2965-3617
Sergei KliverCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, the Globe Institute, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.
Funding
Carlsbergfondet Research Infrastructure CF22-0680Danish National Research Foundation DNRF143ERC-Portugal programmeFCT SFRH/BD/143457/2019Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)Portuguese MCTES/FCT and ESFSt. Petersburg State University 125021902561-6ZIN 125012800908-0
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Mustelinae are among the most diverse and taxonomically complex subfamilies within the Mustelidae, yet their evolutionary history and genetic diversity remain largely unexplored at the whole-genome level. Here, we present the first comprehensive comparative and phylogenomic study of this lineage, integrating nuclear and mitochondrial genomes from 10 species across the Holarctic and Indomalayan realms. Our dataset includes two novel genome assemblies (Mustela strigidorsa, M. sibirica) and an improved genome for M. nivalis, enabling robust cross-species analyses of genome size, chromosomal evolution, genetic diversity, and demographic history. We uncover striking inter- and intraspecific variation in genome-wide heterozygosity and genome size, with evidence of marked homozygosity in some Asian lineages (M. eversmanii, M. sibirica, M. strigidorsa) and remarkable genetic diversity in widespread species such as M. nivalis and M. erminea. Phylogenomic results support the previously suggested split of M. richardsonii from M. erminea, but we found no evidence for speciation within M. nivalis. Ancestral reconstruction of chromosomal rearrangements revealed key chromosomal fissions that shaped the Mustelinae radiation, including early events predating the divergence of modern Mustela species. The results confirmed the suggested ancestral karyotypes of Mustela (2n = 44) and Mustelinae (2n = 42). Finally, demographic reconstructions exposed species-specific responses to Quaternary climatic cycles, ranging from long-term resilience in M. nivalis to repeated population bottlenecks in M. putorius and M. sibirica. Collectively, our findings establish a genomic foundation for future evolutionary and conservation genomic research on this emblematic Mustelidae lineage.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Comparative Genomics and Phylogenomics of the Mustelinae Lineage (Mustelidae, Carnivora). · full record | OpenQuestion