Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782170›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Reliable Multi-Class Mental Health Prediction Using a WiSARD Discriminator Model on Imbalanced Data.

Muhammad Binsawad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muhammad BinsawadDepartment of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0915-7058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ML-based mental disorder prediction plays an increasingly important role in early screening, clinical decision support, and personalized mental healthcare. However, reliable multi-class classification remains challenging due to high dimensionality, class imbalance, and subtle psychological features. This study describes an interpretable, RAM-based WiSARD classifier for the multi-disorder mental health prediction problem and compares its performance to established models. A retrospective experimental study was carried out in the year 2024 using publicly available mental-health diagnostic data from the Kaggle Mental Disorders Dataset. The dataset consisted of 637 records and 29 symptom-based features representing disorders such as Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, PTSD, OCD, ADHD, Bipolar Disorder, and others. Records with missing values, incomplete diagnostic labels, or duplicated entries were excluded. Thus, 637 complete cases were selected for analysis. No clinical identifiers were involved, and hence, ethical clearance was not required. In the present study, WiSARD was tested using a 10-fold stratified cross-validation design against Multilayer Perceptron, Naïve Bayes, DTNB, IB1, and A1DE. The performance was computed using precision, recall, F-measure, accuracy, MCC, MAE, and KS. The study was geographically conducted in Pakistan as part of computational healthcare research. WiSARD classifier achieved the best overall performance with an overall accuracy of 98.27%, F-measure of 0.983, MCC of 0.982, and KS of 0.981, outperforming all baseline models under the same evaluation conditions. Analysis of ROC-AUC, TPR, TNR, and error distributions further showed that WiSARD was more tolerant of misclassifications associated with minority disorder classes, thereby addressing the imbalance present in the dataset. The ablation study verified its contribution to improved reliability and interpretability through RAM-based pattern recognition. The results have shown that WiSARD is a promising, interpretable model for multi-class mental disorder prediction in data-imbalanced settings. At the same time, results are limited to a single non-clinical Kaggle dataset with self-reported observations and without formal psychiatric validation. For this reason, the findings should be interpreted as indicative rather than definitive.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersBayes TheoremClassification AlgorithmsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesclinical decision supportimbalanced datamachine learningmental disorder predictionmulti-class classificationpsychological diagnosisRAM-based learningWiSARD classifier

Identifiers

PMID41782170
PMCPMC12961118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.