ArticleInjury epidemiology2026
Trends in unintentional injury death among post-9/11 Army Veterans who do and do not use Veteran Health Administration services.
Article in Injury epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is unknown if unintentional injury death rates vary among Army Veterans who do and do not use the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We estimated, and compared by VHA-use group, age-adjusted average annual unintentional injury death rates and time-dependent hazard rates (HRs) after separation.
methodsData were from the Substance Use and Psychological Injury Combat Study, a longitudinal cohort of Army soldiers returning from an Afghanistan/Iraq deployment in FYs 2008-2014 using administrative data from the Military Health System, Veterans Health Administration and National Death Index. We selected soldiers who separated from active duty service by 9/30/2017 (n = 649,811). The exposure was time since separation, moderated by VHA-use group. The outcome was unintentional injury death (all, motor vehicle crash [MVC], overdose) through 2018.
resultsThe HR for all unintentional injury and MVC death for 0-2 years post-separation were higher for the no VHA-use group than the VHA-use group (e.g., MVC, year 0-1 HR: 75.1 (95% CI: 61.7, 88.4) vs. 16.4 (95% CI: 12.8, 20.0)). This changed to either no difference or higher risk for the VHA-use group as time since separation increased. For unintentional overdose, there was no difference in HRs between groups in 0-2 years post-separation; risk was higher for the VHA-use group for the remainder of follow-up (e.g., no VHA use, years 3-5 HR: 8.7 (95% CI: 5.1, 12.3) vs. 28.9 (95% CI: 25.2, 32.5) for VHA use group).
conclusionsThe risk for unintentional MVC and overdose death since separation differed based on use of VHA services among post-9/11 Veterans. Intervention strategies that address differences in time since separation and whether Veterans use the VHA or not may be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.