ArticleBMC public health2026
Beyond what meets the eye: unveiling dynamics of compliance with preventive measures in the COVID-19 era.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious longitudinal studies identified variability in compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures, noting the heightened sensitivity of the least compliant groups to situational factors like easing restrictions. However, they overlooked other forms of variability inherent in compliance behaviour. Hence, we investigated compliance with social distancing and staying-at-home measures, and its dynamic nature, along with its association with social and individual factors.
methodsData from a longitudinal study involving 1984 Canadians across six time points from April 2020 to July 2020 were analyzed. Compliance levels were assessed through self-reported items, alongside social and individual factors like trust in Canadian health services and in the Prime Minister, perception of social norms, and subjective health literacy.
resultsLatent Class Growth Analysis revealed three compliance trajectories during mandatory and lifting measures periods: “Low and constant” (shifting to “Low and decreasing” during lifting measures), “High and decreasing,” and “High and constant” for both preventive measures (social distancing and staying-at-home). Most Canadians belonged in the “High and decreasing” trajectory during the mandatory and lifting measures periods: 53.68% and 54.89% for social distancing; 51.71% and 53.48% for staying-at-home. Subjective health literacy consistently predicted membership to trajectories of compliance with preventive measures. Transition movements between trajectories mostly showed stability (between 86.83% and 91.55% for social distancing; between 80.24% and 88.69% for staying-at-home). Two factors, namely perception of provincial norms and trust in Canadian health services, were moderate predictors of transitions toward higher compliance trajectories for both preventive measures during the mandatory and lifting measures periods.
conclusionsOur study not only reaffirms variability in compliance patterns within the lowest compliance group but also unveils variability among higher compliance groups, notably in trajectory transition movements. Subjective health literacy consistently emerged as a strong indicator of trajectory membership, while perception of provincial norms and trust in Canadian health services moderately influenced trajectory change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.