ArticleBMC public health2026
Mind the gaps and educational disparities in awareness of cancer risk factors: a cross-sectional study amongst the general public in Sweden.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch indicates that about 40% of all cancer cases within the European Union (EU) are preventable. Public awareness of modifiable risk factors is essential for informed health-related decision-making. Systematic assessments of public awareness are crucial for identifying awareness gaps and guiding targeted public health interventions. This study aimed to examine awareness of cancer risk factors among the Swedish general public, and to examine the attitude towards lifestyle changes for cancer prevention.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used a pre-existing data set with a randomly selected sample of 1520 participants (18–84 years old) recruited from a Swedish online survey panel in April 2024. Statistical analyses utilized post-stratification weights to make the results representative for the general Swedish population. Pearson’s χ2-test and weighted adjusted logistic regression were used to test for associations between demographic characteristics, believing that changed lifestyle habits could reduce one’s cancer risk, and awareness of 20 established risk factors for cancer.
resultsA majority (63.6%) of the respondents believed that one’s cancer risk could be reduced through changed lifestyle habits. Most were aware of smoking (97.1%), sun exposure (92.4%), hereditary factors (91.0%), sunbeds (90.2%), and air pollution (90.2%), while fewer were aware of alcohol (64.9%), obesity (61.6%), overweight (58.1%), and processed meat (53.3%) as cancer risk factors. A minority of the responders were aware of low levels of physical activity (48.1%), red meat (38.9%), low intake of fruit and vegetables (32.9%), low intake of whole grains (23.7%) and not breast-feeding one’s child (9.3%) as risk factors. For most risk factors, the awareness was significantly higher among college/university educated respondents.
conclusionsBeside significant awareness gaps among the Swedish general public regarding several established cancer risk factors, this study found an educational gradient, illuminating important differences in cancer prevention awareness. Achieving meaningful improvements in cancer prevention awareness requires coordinated system-level and policy-level actions to reduce the educational gradient and ensure equitable access to information. This could in turn increase people’s ability to make well-informed decisions regarding their lifestyle habits and preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.