Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782096›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

Uncertainty-aware hybrid deep generative framework for robust and explainable drug discovery.

Saniya Gupta, A Sherly Alphonse, D Kavitha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saniya GuptaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Chennai, India.
A Sherly AlphonseSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Chennai, India. sherly.a@vit.ac.in.
D KavithaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional techniques in drug discovery are time-consuming and less accurate due to the vast chemical space and associated uncertainty. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have introduced new methods to improve the drug discovery process. But still, some challenges need to be overcome, like higher attrition rates and the need to optimize multiple molecular properties simultaneously. The proposed study overcomes these problems by introducing a novel hybrid computational framework that integrates Graph Convolutional Networks, Variational Autoencoders, and Uncertainty Aware Adaptive Multi-Objective Optimization-based Reinforcement Learning (UAAMOO-RL) for generating drug molecules with needed pharmacological properties. By combining uncertainty awareness and explainability, the proposed method generates new drug molecules, prioritizing reliability and reducing false positives, thereby addressing two challenges in drug discovery, such as robustness and interpretability. The proposed framework is trained and validated using the ChEMBL dataset, consisting of 1.5 million bioactive molecules with known properties. The results indicate that the proposed model achieves a QED pass rate of 88.8% at a threshold of [Formula: see text] = 0.60, which outperforms the state-of-the-art techniques while maintaining structural diversity, uniqueness, and validity. Results also show significant improvement on the Zinc250k (82.7%) and PDBbind (85.9%) datasets. The proposed approach enhances early-stage drug discovery by reducing exhaustive experimental screening.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoveryAlgorithmsAutoencoderGenerative Artificial IntelligenceGraph Neural NetworksReinforcement Machine LearningUncertaintyDrug discoveryExplainabilityMolecular graphReinforcement learningUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41782096
PMCPMC13067696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.