ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Barriers and facilitators to implementing strategies for reducing inappropriate antipsychotic use in long-term care: a scoping review.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate use of antipsychotics negatively affects the quality of life of residents in long-term care (LTC). Despite efforts to reduce inappropriate antipsychotic use, understanding of how to implement antipsychotic reduction strategies remains limited.
objectiveThis scoping review explores: (1) the types of effective non-pharmacological strategies used to reduce antipsychotic use in LTC, (2) barriers to their implementation, and (3) facilitators supporting their implementation. METHODOLOGY: Following the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute, we synthesize existing evidence. A three-step search strategy was conducted across databases for publications from January 2014 to September 2024. Data extraction was thematically analyzed and subsequently compared with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for further insights. The review team comprised diverse stakeholders, including patient and family partners, and healthcare providers.
findingsThe review identified three main types of strategies with positive outcomes: person-centred care and environmental adaptation, medication review and monitoring, and regulatory measures, with education and training cutting across these strategies. Key implementation barriers included staff and family resistance, poor team coordination and communication, and challenges with staffing and training, which could be addressed by related facilitators: cultural shifts, a cohesive team approach, and improvements to staffing and training. Beyond those addressing specific barriers, additional facilitators included increased accountability and the use of multifaceted approaches. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings underscore the need for comprehensive, integrated approaches that combine clinical, organizational, and educational strategies to overcome implementation challenges. Future initiatives should prioritize team-based coordination and engagement from staff, families, and leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.