Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782072›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

The impact of group-based arts activity participation on community residents' psychological well-being: the roles of emotional intelligence and servant organizers.

Yibei Ran, Yunxi Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yibei RanInternational Fine Arts, Kyonggi University, Suwon, South Korea.
Yunxi FengSchool of Art and Design, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, No. 15, West Wenyuan Road, Zhengdong New Area, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450046, China. YunxiFeng1990@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid rising global psychological well-being challenges, particularly among urban populations facing social isolation and role changes, community-based interventions have become critically important. Group arts activities provide a culturally accessible means of enhancing psychological well-being, but their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood theoretically. Guided by social cognitive theory (SCT), this study proposes a triadic framework to examine how personal factors (e.g., emotional intelligence), behavioral factors (e.g., participation in group arts activities), and environmental factors (e.g., servant-oriented organizers) interact to enhance community residents’ psychological well-being. Using a cross-sectional study of 782 participants across 54 community art groups and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), the findings show that participating in group arts activities significantly enhances psychological well-being, with emotional intelligence serving as a mediating factor. Additionally, servant organizers not only directly support participants’ well-being but also influence the relationship between involvement in group arts activities and psychological well-being. These results highlight the complex interplay among individual, behavioral, and environmental factors within community arts programs, extending SCT to these contexts. They offer practical insights for developing effective, theory-driven art initiatives to address the growing psychological well-being needs in urban settings.

Indexed as

ArtEmotional IntelligenceGroup ProcessesPsychological Well-BeingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial GroupYoung AdultEmotional intelligenceGroup-based arts activity participationPsychological well-beingServant organizers

Identifiers

PMID41782072
PMCPMC13067552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.