Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782020›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2026

Chidamide combined with fulvestrant in the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after failure of previous endocrine therapy: a single-arm, single-center, phase 2 study.

La Zou, Xianjun Tang, Pan Deng, Yijing Liu, Ti Yang, Xin Tan, Lu Yang, Wei Li, Xiaohua Zeng

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

La Zou *Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Xianjun Tang *Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Pan DengDepartment of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Yijing LiuDepartment of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Ti YangDepartment of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Xin TanDepartment of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Lu YangDepartment of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Wei LiDepartment of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China. sejishikong508@163.com.
Xiaohua ZengDepartment of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China. zxiaohuacqu@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChidamide is an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor that has been used as an anti-cancer agent. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of chidamide plus fulvestrant in the treatment of HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

methodsEligible patients were women between the ages of 18-75 with HR + /HER2- advanced invasive breast cancer, whose disease relapsed or progressed after endocrine therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Eligible patients were treated with oral chidamide (30 mg twice weekly) plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg on days 1 and 15 of cycle one, and then on day one of each subsequent 28 day cycle) until disease progression or toxicity related intolerance. Premenopausal women received a concomitant GnRH analogue. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival.

resultsBetween Mar 19, 2021, and Mar 20, 2024, a total of 33 patients were enrolled. Of these, 30 patients who completed at least one post-baseline tumor assessment were included in the efficacy analysis. The median age was 54.5 years (range 31-70), with all 30 (100%) patients having an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1. Visceral metastases were present in 80% (n = 24) of cases, and 50% (n = 15) exhibited metastases in > 3 anatomical sites. The median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1-4). In total, 40% (n = 12) had undergone prior CDK4/6i therapy. The median progression-free survival for the entire cohort was 6.3 months (95% CI 5.0-9.0). The objective response rate (ORR) was 10%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 83.3% (partial response + stable disease) and a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 23.3%. Treatment related adverse events of any grade occurred in 30 (100%) patients, of those 9 (30%) were ≥ grade 3. The most frequent hematologic toxicities included leukopenia (all-grade: 67%; grade 3-4: 19%), followed by neutropenia (all-grade: 47%; grade 3-4: 19%) and thrombocytopenia (all-grade: 40%; grade 3-4: 6%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

conclusionsChidamide combined with fulvestrant showed encouraging antitumor activity and tolerable toxicity in pts with HR + /HER2- advanced breast cancer that had progressed after previous endocrine therapy. Trial registration ChiCTR2100044282, registered on March 14th 2021.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFulvestrantAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneYoung AdultAminopyridinesBenzamidesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFulvestrantN-(2-amino-5-fluorobenzyl)-4-(N-(pyridine-3-acrylyl)aminomethyl)benzamideReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneChidamideEndocrine therapyHormone receptor-positiveMetastatic breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID41782020
PMCPMC13072560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.