Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782008›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Emotional disturbances and psychological resilience among earthquake survivors in temporary shelters: assessing the role of life satisfaction.

Emrah Gökkaya, Mehmet Hanefi Topal, Ömer Demirbilek, Muhammed Bedir Baydemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emrah GökkayaBünyan Vocational School, Civil Defence and Firefighting Program, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-3188
Mehmet Hanefi TopalFaculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Finance, Kırklareli University, Kırklareli, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-8694
Ömer DemirbilekFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Türkiye. omer.demirbilek@ozal.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9989-1194
Muhammed Bedir BaydemirArapgir Vocational School, Department of Finance, Banking, and Insurance, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4253-6140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to examine the levels of emotional disturbances, psychological resilience, and life satisfaction among earthquake survivors residing in temporary shelters in Hatay province following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş-centred earthquakes. Additionally, it seeks to identify the critical role of life satisfaction. METHODOLOGY: This study employs a quantitative, correlational research design with data collected from 408 participants selected through purposive sampling. Participants range in age from 18 to 70 years. Data collection utilizes face-to-face surveys administered through a demographic information form, the Brief Psychological Resilience Scale (BPRS), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21). Analyses are performed using JASP (v.0.19.3.0), incorporating descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, ANOVA, mediation, and moderation analyses.

findingsThe results reveal that female and younger earthquake survivors report significantly higher levels of emotional disturbances. Emotional disturbances negatively predict psychological resilience, whereas life satisfaction positively predicts psychological resilience. No meaningful relationship emerges between emotional disturbances and life satisfaction. Moderation analyses demonstrate that life satisfaction significantly moderates the relationship between stress, anxiety, depression, and psychological resilience. However, mediation analyses indicate that neither life satisfaction nor emotional disturbances mediate the relationship between psychological resilience and the other Variables.

conclusionAccording to the research findings, depression, anxiety and stress negatively affect psychological resilience, while life satisfaction plays a role in increasing vulnerability rather than fulfilling its expected buffering function; it shows that groups such as women, younger generations, and single individuals exhibit higher levels of mood disorders and lower levels of psychological resilience; and that the relationship between educational level and psychological resilience is shaped by cultural context. Therefore, in disaster management processes, rather than focusing solely on increasing life satisfaction, developing goal-oriented psychosocial interventions aimed at reducing mood disorders, community solidarity programs, and psychological support services integrated into the insurance system are critical for sustainable disaster resilience. This study highlights a crucial paradox for post-disaster mental health: life satisfaction, rather than buffering the impact of emotional distress, can unexpectedly increase psychological vulnerability.

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsEarthquakesPersonal SatisfactionResilience, PsychologicalSurvivorsAdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingStress, PsychologicalEarthquake survivorsEmotional disturbancesLife satisfactionPsychological resilienceTemporary shelters

Identifiers

PMID41782008
PMCPMC13069818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.