ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
How do people with COPD experience telerehabilitation using exergaming? A qualitative study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentre-based pulmonary rehabilitation improves symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but barriers such as accessibility and adherence limit participation. Home-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) may provide a feasible alternative, but patient perspectives are not well understood. This study explored the experiences and perceptions of patients with COPD regarding participation in a home-based PTR, using an exergaming system.
methodsThis qualitative study design used individual semi-structured interviews with 11 patients with COPD who had completed a 12-week exergaming PTR programme. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed via inductive content analysis, as outlined by Graneheim and Lundman.
resultsAn overarching theme was identified as "well-functioning technology at home, with continuous support from a physiotherapist, increases the opportunities for people with COPD to exercise on their own individual terms". Three major categories and nine subcategories captured participants' experiences. The first major category, "technology and equipment challenge and enable exercise at home", captured experiences of flexibility, playful feedback, and motivation, but also frustration with technical issues and limited space. The second main category, "Getting the right support adds value when exercising with exergaming", included reassurance, motivation, and enhanced self-efficacy through physiotherapist feedback, monitoring, and individual adaptation. The third category, "there are considerable challenges for people with COPD regarding exercise", encompassed symptom variability, the need to balance effort with daily capacity, and mixed experiences of competitive elements, although some participants reported functional improvements and reduced fear of exertion.
conclusionHome-based exergaming PTR was acceptable and motivating when the technology was reliable and physiotherapist support was sustained. Programmes should prioritise robust equipment, clear feedback, and individualised exercise to enhance adherence and long-term benefit.
trial registrationThe study is registered in the database FOU i Sverige (R&D in Sweden) with registration number: 273,768, date for registration: April 1, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.