ArticleBioData mining2026
Deep learning-enabled ECG system for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy and predicting cardiovascular prognoses.
Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a common condition with a prevalence of 15%-20% in general population. Prior studies have suggested that deep learning model (DLM)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) systems can aid LVH detection and cardiovascular risk assessment; however, conventional manual ECG criteria have limited sensitivity and their prognostic utility remains suboptimal. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a DLM-enabled ECG system to detect LVH and evaluate its prognostic associations with incident cardiovascular outcomes. A total of 40,736 patients from hospital A were used for model development (training and tuning) and internal validation (29,595/5,935/5,206 patients, respectively), and 6,271 patients from hospital B were used for external validation. LVH was defined by left ventricular mass index (LVMI) derived from echocardiography. Prognostic outcomes included new-onset acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and atrial fibrillation (AFib). In the external validation set, our AI-ECG-LVH model achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.82 in males and 0.77 in females. Furthermore, the hazard ratios for incident AMI, HF, and AFib were 2.67, 3.15, and 2.23 for AI-ECG-LVH, compared with 2.76, 3.78, and 2.25 for echocardiography-defined LVH (ECHO-LVH). Our AI-ECG-LVH model may provide a straightforward, affordable, and noninvasive approach for LVH screening and first-contact risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.