Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781924›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026

A unique case of unilateral optic pit and coloboma without macular pathology: an asymptomatic 42-year-old female.

İsa Yuvacı, Muhammed Muaz Osmanoğlu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

İsa YuvacıDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sakarya University Medical Faculty, Sakarya, Türkiye. mdisay@hotmail.com.
Muhammed Muaz OsmanoğluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sakarya University Medical Faculty, Sakarya, Türkiye. muazosmanoglu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9164-3814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo report a rare case of unilateral hybrid optic disc anomaly characterized by the coexistence of optic disc pit and optic disc coloboma in the absence of maculopathy, evaluated with multimodal imaging including optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). CASE PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old asymptomatic woman was found to have coexisting optic disc pit and temporal optic disc coloboma in the right eye. Visual acuity was normal, and no structural or clinical evidence of maculopathy was detected. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated preserved macular architecture. Fluorescein angiography (FFA) showed normal vascular filling without leakage. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) revealed a hypointense area at the base of the pit and localized peripapillary capillary rarefaction. The absence of corresponding FFA abnormalities suggests that the OCTA hypointensity may reflect signal attenuation rather than true ischemia.

conclusionsHybrid optic disc anomalies are exceedingly rare, and the absence of maculopathy in this setting is exceptional. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a hybrid optic disc anomaly without associated maculopathy, as well as the first evaluated using OCTA. Multimodal imaging, including OCT, OCTA, and FFA, is essential for accurate characterization, and OCTA findings should be interpreted cautiously in deeply excavated lesions.

Indexed as

ColobomaOptic DiskOptic NerveAdultFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansMacula LuteaMultimodal ImagingTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityMaculopathyOCT-AngiographyOptical coherence tomographyOptic disc colobomaPit

Identifiers

PMID41781924
PMCPMC13067638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.