Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781815›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026

Rezafungin exhibits anti-biofilm properties against fungal biofilms in vitro.

Hafsa Abduljalil, Kerry Bartie, Abhijit M Bal, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Craig Williams, Ryan Kean, Gordon Ramage

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hafsa AbduljalilSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Kerry BartieSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3037-5295
Abhijit M BalMicrobiology Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5474-4783
Riina Rautemaa-RichardsonMycology Reference Centre Manchester, ECMM Centre of Excellence, and Department of Infectious Diseases, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK; and Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1071-6040
Craig WilliamsMicrobiology Department, Lancaster Royal Infirmary, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5002-6215
Ryan KeanSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6636-4278
Gordon RamageSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0932-3514

Funding

MundiPharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to evaluate the comparative activity of rezafungin compared with caspofungin and other antifungal classes against biofilms from a large clinical panel of Candida strains (n = 167).

methodsBiofilm killing and inhibition were assessed using standard XTT [2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide salt] metabolic assessment. Biofilm time-kill kinetics were also evaluated using metabolic and viable cell counts. Microscopy was performed to visually assess biofilm inhibition.

resultsRezafungin was shown to outperform caspofungin and other antifungals against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis and Nakaseomyces glabratus (previously called C. glabrata) strains with a heterogeneous biofilm phenotype. Assessment of high biofilm-forming strains at 0.03 mg/L concentrations showed that rezafungin killed biofilms to an equal or greater extent than caspofungin. Time-kill studies showed a rapid reduction in metabolism and viable cfus by both rezafungin and caspofungin, but with little difference between both compounds. Evaluation of biofilm inhibition characteristics of both compounds showed that rezafungin was marginally more effective than caspofungin, which was corroborated by microscopical analyses.

conclusionsTogether, these data show that rezafungin is non-inferior to caspofungin in terms of anti-biofilm activity and displays characteristics that suggest it can control biofilms more effectively than caspofungin. Further evaluation is required to establish whether these in vitro effects translate clinically, but the data indicate an opportunity for rezafungin to be used for the clinical management of biofilm-related diseases.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiofilmsCandidaEchinocandinsCaspofunginHumansLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityMicroscopyTetrazolium SaltsAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptidesRezafunginTetrazolium Salts

Identifiers

PMID41781815
PMCPMC13017008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.