ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Evaluation of Readability in Patient Education Materials for Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding Low Motivation for Treatment in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Providers in the United States.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient education is essential for effective medical care. Although over half of patients search for health information online, most educational materials exceed the recommended sixth-grade reading level. Parathyroid disease is common yet often underdiagnosed. This study evaluates the readability of online patient resources for parathyroid disorders. A review of 100 online educational materials related to parathyroid disorders was performed. Using three validated instruments: Flesch Reading Ease, Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog Index scores, reading grade level was calculated and Spearman correlations performed to evaluate associations between instruments. 59 sources were included. Majority of materials were from academic/research (36%), followed by general information/overviews (20%), government/institutional (14%), cancer-specific organizations (12%), professional societies (12%) and children’s health (5%). No patient materials were written at the appropriate grade level. Materials were > 12th grade reading level in 59% of sources (FRE = 71%, SMOG = 34%, GFI = 71%). There were strong, positive correlations between the three reading instruments. Readable educational materials facilitate effective healthcare literacy and empower patients to participate in shared decision-making, which is especially important given the complex diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for parathyroid disorders. This study demonstrates a significant ongoing disparity. Future efforts should focus on developing patient materials at the recommended reading level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41781802What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.