ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Training4all project - from an advanced minimally invasive surgery course to a national training program.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The learning curve of robotic esophagectomy: a systematic review with a proposed training and competency assessment framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an increased demand for minimally invasive surgery training by General surgery residents due to the challenges faced by surgical residency, in the last few years. Comprehensive, structured, simulation-based curricula are a valuable solution to address these challenges. An innovative hands-on surgical course has been developed, focused on advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Data provided from two questionnaires of the first two editions were analyzed. Sixteen trainees (n = 16) without experience in robotic surgery participated in the courses and the majority were residents (n = 15). The course has been considered very important for acquiring advanced Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) skills, as well as basic robotic surgery skills. There has been a significant general improvement (M = 4.0; SD = 0.555), specially in regard to autonomy in laparoscopic suture (p < .001), laparoscopic anastomosis (p < .001), laparoscopic fundoplication (p < .001), right colectomy (p < .001) and rectum resection (p < .001). On the other hand, our advanced MIS course highlighted gaps in resident surgical training. The findings of these two preliminary courses led us to design a new residency-long training program from basic to advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Our study showed that Hands-on MIS courses are very highly valued by residents. Independent independent courses are valuable for skills acquisition but we believe that a nationwide, comprehensive and simulation-based program, like the one we present can answer to the needs of structured, progressive and accessible training in General Surgery. Future studies are planned to assess the outcomes of this program in residents' proficiency and its impact in patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41781762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.