ArticleBehavior research methods2026
An iterative strategy for referent variable selection in MIMIC-interaction modeling.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Examining cross-group latent differences in various research contexts has brought measurement invariance/equivalence into the spotlight. One major limitation of measurement invariance testing through multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) has been recognized yet has not received much attention: the selection of a referent observed variable. Recently, multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC)-interaction modeling with the all-other anchor method (i.e., a constrained baseline approach) has been used to identify referent variables in a repetitive manner. This study proposed an iterative search strategy in MIMIC-interaction models to improve the accuracy of referent variable selection, particularly when the proportion of noninvariance increases. A Monte Carlo simulation design was used to evaluate the effects of the proportion of noninvariance, magnitude of noninvariance, magnitude of latent variable differences, and sample size. The accuracy rate was used to assess the performance of selecting referent variables from among truly invariant observed variables in the population. Results showed that the iterative strategy generally outperformed the repetitive strategy for locating credible referent variables across nearly all conditions, suggesting that the iterative strategy is a reliable and practical approach for referent variable selection in applications. The superiority of the iterative strategy over the repetitive strategy became substantial in the conditions of high proportions of noninvariance, large latent variable differences, or a combination of both. We present an illustrative example to demonstrate the applicability of the iterative strategy for referent variable selection in MIMIC-interaction modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41781693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.