Trial reportScientific reports2026
Exploratory randomized trial of Weissella cibaria CMU and oral microbiome changes in peri implant mucositis.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The oral microbiome plays an important role in maintaining peri-implant health, and microbial imbalance is a key factor in the development of peri-implant mucositis (PIM). Probiotics have been proposed as a strategy to modulate the oral microbiome, but clinical evidence in peri-implant conditions remains limited. In this randomized exploratory trial, patients with PIM received the probiotic Weissella cibaria CMU (OraCMU) or placebo for four weeks following standard supragingival scaling and oral hygiene instruction. Subgingival microbiome profiles and clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and follow-up. While overall microbial diversity showed no marked differences between groups, OraCMU administration was associated with favorable compositional changes within the subgingival microbiome. This included enrichment of bacterial taxa commonly associated with peri-implant health and suppression of taxa linked to inflammatory peri-implant conditions. Consistent trends toward reduced abundance of key periopathogenic species were observed in the probiotic group compared with placebo. A modest improvement in probing depth was also noted in patients with moderate PIM receiving OraCMU. Together, these findings indicate that short-term probiotic supplementation may support ecological stabilization of the peri-implant microbiome. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether such microbiome modulation translates into sustained clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.