Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781671›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Controlled hot pressing for functional upcycling of waste polyethylene materials.

Dong Cheng, Wen-Jie Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dong ChengFujian Key Laboratory of Functional Textile Fibers and Products, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Wen-Jie YanFujian Key Laboratory of Functional Textile Fibers and Products, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, 350108, China. yanwenjie2003@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-2959

Funding

2025 Basic Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education LJ112511035005Fujian Natural Science Foundation Project 2023J05252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic waste represents an escalating environmental challenge and necessitates scalable processing strategies consistent with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 12 on responsible consumption and production. This work examines controlled hot pressing of polyethylene-based waste as a physical upcycling route for producing functional laminate sheets. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polyethylene-coated polypropylene (PP/PE composite) were investigated, with processing temperature, pressure, and dwell time systematically analysed using an orthogonal experimental design. LDPE exhibited the most favourable forming behaviour, achieving continuous sheet formation at 120-130 °C under a nominal pressure of approximately 0.59 MPa with limited thickness variation. Relative to unprocessed films, hot-pressed materials displayed reduced surface friction and increased water contact angles, indicating decreased surface wettability under the applied conditions. Microscopic observations revealed modified surface morphology after processing, while elemental mapping showed no pronounced changes in macroscopic elemental distribution. HDPE achieved comparable consolidation, whereas PP/PE composites did not form continuous laminates. The results indicate that controlled hot pressing provides a low-energy and reproducible pathway for converting post-consumer polyethylene films into functional materials for circular applications.

Indexed as

Circular materials designControlled hot pressingLaminate consolidationPlastic upcyclingRecycled polyethylene materialsSurface microstructuring

Identifiers

PMID41781671
PMCPMC13068946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.