ArticleScientific reports2026
Surface integrity and machinability analysis in dry hard turning of X38CrMoV5-1 steel using coated and uncoated ceramic tools.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the machinability and surface integrity of hardened X38CrMoV5-1 steel (50 HRC) during dry hard turning using coated and uncoated mixed ceramic cutting tools (Al₂O₃/TiC). The influence of cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and nose radius on surface roughness (Ra), cutting force (Fc), specific cutting force (Kc), and material removal rate (MRR) was analyzed using Taguchi design, Response Surface Methodology (RSM), and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Experimental results showed that Ra varied between 0.18 and 1.51 μm, Fc between 25.57 and 207.45 N, and Kc between 1423 and 3925 MPa within the selected cutting conditions. Feed rate and depth of cut were identified as the most significant parameters affecting surface roughness and cutting forces. Uncoated ceramic tools consistently produced lower cutting forces, improved surface finish, and longer tool life compared with TiN-coated tools under identical dry machining conditions. The maximum tool life reached 41 min for the uncoated insert (r = 1.2 mm), while the coated insert reached 28.5 min under the same parameters (Vc = 150 m/min, f = 0.08 mm/rev, ap = 0.30 mm). Two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface analyses, along with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), revealed that abrasion was the dominant wear mechanism, with adhesion and diffusion contributing to crater formation. The developed RSM models demonstrated high goodness of fit within the studied parameter range. This work provides a comparative evaluation of coated and uncoated Al₂O₃/TiC ceramic tools for sustainable dry hard turning of hardened steel, highlighting the influence of machining parameters on surface integrity and tool performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.