ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on precision prediction of heavy-duty lathes based on hybrid PINNS neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A positioning error prediction method based on hybrid physical information neural networks ( Hybrid-PINNs) was proposed to solve the problem of heavy CNC lathe positioning accuracy which is difficult to reliably predict in few-shot and complex working conditions.By combining the easily obtained spatial position sensor data with the engineering approximate physical constraints (position continuity and smoothness), the data item and physical residual item were introduced into the neural network training objective at the same time, so as to improve the extrapolation and robustness of the model. Based on the actual measured data of Z-axis of a certain type of heavy lathe (Section A for augmented training, Section B/C for extrapolation test).The results show that the hybrid model demonstrates a significant improvement compared with the single model in test of Section B, Section C and the merged B C.In section B, relative to BP, PINNs reduced error by 60.4%, and Hybrid-PINNs further reduced it to 82.8%; relative to RBF, Hybrid-PINNs achieved a 70.1% reduction. In section C, relative to BP, PINNs reduced error by 82.0%, and Hybrid-PINNs further reduced it to 86.8%; relative to PINNs, Hybrid-PINNs still achieved a 76.9%reduction. In Section B and C, relative to BP, Hybrid-PINNs reduced overall error by 85.3%; relative to RBF, the reduction reached 79.0%. To ensure the engineering applicability, the article also detailed the preprocessing approach using sixth-order polynomial fitting and equidistant sampling, along with the model architecture, loss weighting, training procedure, and linear calibration workflow. The study provides a feasible technical path with both physical consistency and data-driven capability for online state monitoring and accuracy compensation of heavy machine tools.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.