Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781643›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of psychoanalysis2026

The Prenatal in Lacan's Borromean Knot.

Lutz Goetzmann, Ludwig Janus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of psychoanalysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lutz GoetzmannInstitute of Philosophy, Psychoanalysis and Cultural Studies (IPPK), Maybachufer 20, 12047, Berlin, Germany. goetzmann@ippk.de.
Ludwig JanusClinics of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Otto Rank identified the trauma of birth and its psychological sequelae. Subsequently, the manifold observations made by pre- and perinatal natal psychology show that prenatal and birth experiences have a formative character for the individual. In the present article, we emphasize the relationship that might exist between Lacan's Real and the Prenatal. Both are characterized by the fact that there is no "symbolization," (i.e., there is neither the formation of imaginary nor symbolic thoughts). However, we propose that the unborn develops a consciousness that takes in the effects of the real. This consciousness is called "phenomenal." Emphasizing the dynamic between the phenomenal and the real, the effect of the Real on the phenomenal could be called the "phenoreal." Later representations will be possible due to the Freudian concept of "afterwardness," (i.e., due to the subsequent signification of the phenomenal by the imaginary and symbolic registers of knowledge). Pre- and perinatal psychology and Lacanian psychoanalysis will benefit both conceptually and clinically from this link between two related fields.

Indexed as

Lacanian TheoryFemaleHumansPregnancyaterwardnessBorromean knoteffectphenorealprenatal psychologyReal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.