ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2026
Evaluating Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Suicide-Risk-Stratified Veterans Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading risk factor for death by suicide. To better treat MDD, and reduce suicide risk, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, prioritizes a range of psychotherapeutic treatments, including MDD specific evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs). To better understand the utilization of these interventions, and these interventions’ roles in suicide prevention, this study investigates a national sample of MDD-diagnosed VA patients who died and did not die by suicide in 2017 and 2018. The study used a dataset of VA patients diagnosed with MDD who died by suicide and received psychotherapy in the year before death (cases) and patients who had comparable diagnoses, demographics, and received psychotherapy during the same interval and remained alive (controls). Each case was matched with 10 controls who shared the same VA’s suicide risk algorithm risk score. The study tracked non-differentiated psychotherapy and MDD EBP, analyzed cases and controls’ utilization rates across risk-tiers (high, moderate, low), and conceptualized eight sessions as the minimum adequate treatment. Our final sample included high-risk (cases = 257; controls = 2570), moderate-risk (cases = 428 cases; controls = 4280), and low-risk (cases = 53; controls = 529) patients. No groups received adequate session count. MDD EBP utilization was markedly low, especially among cases, with < 1% of the high-risk sample receiving adequate sessions. Higher proportions of moderate- and low-risk controls received MDD EBP and received more sessions than matched cases. Even with VA efforts to promote EBPs, within our sample, MDD EBP usage was limited, particularly among patients who died by suicide. Further research is needed to understand utilization barriers and improve MDD EBP delivery to better support suicide prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41781607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.