ArticleScientific reports2026
Treatment of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia as a potential driver for antimicrobial resistance in pastoral production systems of Kenya.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The control of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) remains constrained by institutional, financial and technical barriers in many livestock-keeping regions of sub-Saharan Africa, despite its detrimental impact on trade, pastoral livelihoods and food security. Therefore, livestock keepers are relying on suboptimal use of antimicrobials to manage CBPP outbreaks. We conducted an outbreak investigation to understand epidemiological and management practices in 95 herds with ongoing or recent cases of CBPP in five counties of Kenya. A wide range of antimicrobials including tetracycline, penicillin-streptomycin (pen & strep), tylosin, and diminazen were used in majority of herds (90/95; 94.7%), with half of these herds receiving sequential administration of two or more types of drugs to address failure of the first use. Only 33/95 (34.7%) of farmers reported to have vaccinated their animals and most of them vaccinated in response to outbreaks in their herds rather than the expected routine preventive program (28/33, 84.8%). The average case fatality rate (CFR) for CBPP was estimated at 36%, with only treatment with tylosin resulting in a significant reduction in mortalities due to CBPP (p = 0.035). Majority of livestock keepers (83.3%) continued to consume milk from their animals during and after the treatment period, without observing the stipulated withdrawal periods. Policy emphasis should shift toward prudent use of antimicrobials and preventive vaccination as the cornerstone of CBPP control, while using multifaceted One Health strategy that bridges veterinary, public health, and environmental sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.