ArticleScientific reports2026
Cut instance mixing: A domain-specific data augmentation method applied to gastrointestinal lesion detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of gastrointestinal lesions such as intestinal metaplasia (IM), dysplasia, and polyps remains challenging due to their subtle appearance and the scarcity of well-annotated medical image datasets. To address this limitation, we introduce Cut Instance Mixing (CIM), a domain-specific data augmentation method designed to generate anatomically plausible lesion-containing images through the identification of biologically relevant regions of interest and seamless lesion blending using Poisson image editing and gradient-based mixing. CIM was evaluated across three distinct endoscopic datasets (IM, dysplasia, and polyps) using a ResNet50 classifier and five-fold cross-validation. The proposed method consistently outperformed state-of-the-art augmentation techniques. In IM classification, CIM with α = 0.8 achieved the highest performance (AUC: 0.879, Accuracy: 0.823), surpassing MixUp, CutMix and random copy-paste. In dysplasia detection, CIM reached near-perfect results (AUC: 0.997, Accuracy: 0.966), and demonstrated strong generalization on an external polyp dataset (AUC: 0.830, Accuracy: 0.769). Grad-CAM analyses further confirmed that CIM preserves clinically relevant features, improving model attention on lesion regions. These findings demonstrate that CIM enables the generation of realistic and biologically coherent synthetic samples, effectively mitigating data imbalance and enhancing classification robustness. The method is architecture-agnostic and broadly applicable to tasks requiring anatomically consistent augmentation, providing a promising direction for improving deep learning systems in gastrointestinal imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.