ArticleScientific reports2026
Soil organic carbon stocks after ten years of reduced tillage, compost and mulch application in temperate organic agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) aims to increase and maintain soil quality for sustainable crop production and to achieve carbon removal targets. Agronomic practices are therefore needed to reduce carbon losses and increase SOC stocks, especially in deep soil layers, which promote long-term storage. Regenerative agriculture is an approach aimed at increasing soil quality for sustainable production and therefore should be suitable for achieving the required goals under organic farming conditions. We analysed SOC content down to a depth of 1 m and calculated the SOC stock based on bulk density after ten years of regenerative farming practices, i.e., reduced tillage, dead organic mulch, and high-quality yard waste compost application, in two organic field trials set up one year apart in Central Germany and we calculated the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) input to the soil from organic amendments and from main crops and cover crops by applying C allocation factors for crop residues, roots, and rhizodeposition. C derived from crops was the main carbon input source over ten years. Increasing C input promoted an increase in the cumulative SOC stock down to 1 m. We observed greater SOC stocks dominated by topsoil changes with reduced tillage and compost application and with the combination of all practices (+ 16%) than in the control with conventional ploughing and no external carbon input while none of the farming practices affected the subsoil SOC stock. Mulch application had no effect at all on SOC stocks. Crop biomass contributed most C input. Farming practices, especially the combination of reduced tillage and compost application, enhanced topsoil SOC stocks and N but not subsoil C storage. Other farming practices and crop rotation adjustments must be identified to increase crop production as well as subsoil SOC stocks and promoting long-term C storage, e.g., by fostering deep-rooting crops and cover crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.