Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781577›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Soil organic carbon stocks after ten years of reduced tillage, compost and mulch application in temperate organic agriculture.

Wiebke Niether, Simeon Leisch-Waskönig, Maria R Finckh, Stephan Martin Junge, Carolina Bilibio, Stephan Peth, Jan Henrik Schmidt, Juliet Wanjiku Kamau, Andreas Gattinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wiebke NietherOrganic Farming with Focus on Sustainable Soil Use, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Karl-Gloeckner- Str. 21 C, 35394, Giessen, Germany. wiebke.niether@agrar.uni-giessen.de.
Simeon Leisch-WaskönigEcological Plant Protection, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Maria R FinckhEcological Plant Protection, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Stephan Martin JungeEcological Plant Protection, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Carolina BilibioSoil Science, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Stephan PethInstitute of Earth System Sciences, Leibniz-University-Hannover, Herrenhäuser Strasse 2, 30419, Hannover, Germany.
Jan Henrik SchmidtInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg 11/12, 38104, Braunschweig, Germany.
Juliet Wanjiku KamauOrganic Farming with Focus on Sustainable Soil Use, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Karl-Gloeckner- Str. 21 C, 35394, Giessen, Germany.
Andreas GattingerOrganic Farming with Focus on Sustainable Soil Use, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Karl-Gloeckner- Str. 21 C, 35394, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) aims to increase and maintain soil quality for sustainable crop production and to achieve carbon removal targets. Agronomic practices are therefore needed to reduce carbon losses and increase SOC stocks, especially in deep soil layers, which promote long-term storage. Regenerative agriculture is an approach aimed at increasing soil quality for sustainable production and therefore should be suitable for achieving the required goals under organic farming conditions. We analysed SOC content down to a depth of 1 m and calculated the SOC stock based on bulk density after ten years of regenerative farming practices, i.e., reduced tillage, dead organic mulch, and high-quality yard waste compost application, in two organic field trials set up one year apart in Central Germany and we calculated the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) input to the soil from organic amendments and from main crops and cover crops by applying C allocation factors for crop residues, roots, and rhizodeposition. C derived from crops was the main carbon input source over ten years. Increasing C input promoted an increase in the cumulative SOC stock down to 1 m. We observed greater SOC stocks dominated by topsoil changes with reduced tillage and compost application and with the combination of all practices (+ 16%) than in the control with conventional ploughing and no external carbon input while none of the farming practices affected the subsoil SOC stock. Mulch application had no effect at all on SOC stocks. Crop biomass contributed most C input. Farming practices, especially the combination of reduced tillage and compost application, enhanced topsoil SOC stocks and N but not subsoil C storage. Other farming practices and crop rotation adjustments must be identified to increase crop production as well as subsoil SOC stocks and promoting long-term C storage, e.g., by fostering deep-rooting crops and cover crops.

Indexed as

Deep C storageRegenerative agricultureSOCSoil quality

Identifiers

PMID41781577
PMCPMC12963617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.