Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781568›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Shifting the paradigm in intracranial aneurysm detection with deep learning: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Bryan Gervais de Liyis, Nathania Nathania, Ongko Hartono, Abdi Marang Gusti Alhaq, Edo Johanes Namalo Sihombing, Muhammad Hafif, Muhammad Kusdiansah, Michael J Lang, Abrar Arham, Arnau Benet and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bryan Gervais de LiyisDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Brain Center Hospital Mahar Mardjono, Jakarta, Indonesia. bgliyis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-754X
Nathania NathaniaFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1982-7160
Ongko HartonoFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4327-8045
Abdi Marang Gusti AlhaqDepartment of Radiology, National Brain Center Hospital Mahar Mardjono, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2425-2061
Edo Johanes Namalo SihombingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rumah Sakit Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7489-0944
Muhammad HafifDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Brain Center Hospital Mahar Mardjono, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4744-9975
Muhammad KusdiansahDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Brain Center Hospital Mahar Mardjono, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8182-6415
Michael J LangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0592-1525
Abrar ArhamDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Brain Center Hospital Mahar Mardjono, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6200-0281
Arnau BenetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph‛s Hospital and Medical Center,, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-6771
Julius JulyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan/Siloam Hospitals, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-0864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background deep learning has emerged as a promising approach for detecting intracranial aneurysms across multiple imaging modalities. To clarify its diagnostic value, a systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken. Methods the review adhered to PRISMA standards and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251151933). Eligible studies included original peer-reviewed investigations reporting the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning systems, alone or in combination with radiologists, for the detection of intracranial aneurysms on CTA, MRA, or DSA. Both ruptured and unruptured lesions were considered. Data extraction followed a standardized protocol, and risk of bias was appraised using the QUADAS framework. Pooled estimates were generated under random-effects models, with heterogeneity explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results thirty-four studies comprising 49,748 patients and 6,751 aneurysms met inclusion criteria. The pooled mean age was 57.5 ± 1.9 years, and the average aneurysm size was 5.0 ± 0.6 mm. The sROC model demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% [95%CI: 86%–92%], specificity of 89% [95%CI: 84%–93%], and an AUC of 0.95 [95%CI: 0.93–0.96]. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 69 [95%CI: 37–129], with LR + 8.5 and LR– 0.12. Subgroup analysis showed the highest accuracy when deep learning was combined with radiologists (sensitivity 92%, specificity 95%, DOR 250) and when DSA was used as the imaging modality (sensitivity 91%, specificity 93%, DOR 153). Meta-regression identified patient age as a significant covariate for specificity (p = 0.007). Conclusion deep learning demonstrates high accuracy for aneurysm detection, particularly when integrated with radiologists and trained on DSA.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIntracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyHumansSensitivity and SpecificityDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyIntracranial aneurysmNeuroimaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.