ArticleScientific reports2026
Feasibility and application of an adsorption model for coal pore structure analysis through N
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pore structure of coal critically influences the occurrence and migration of coalbed methane. Low-temperature nitrogen adsorption (LTNA) is a key method for characterizing the properties of coal pores. However, the accuracy of experimental data directly determines model precision. In this study, LTNA experiments were conducted on six coal samples with varying degrees of metamorphism. The adsorption models were evaluated using residual and root-mean-square error analyses. The results showed that low- and medium-rank coals exhibited type-IV isotherms, indicating bottleneck-shaped mesopores. By contrast, higher-rank coal yielded type-II isotherms, suggesting a predominance of micropores. Unlike traditional methods that assume ideal smooth pore walls, this study systematically applies the Quenched Solid Density Functional Theory (QSDFT) to address the inherent heterogeneity and multiscale nature of coal reservoirs. Among the models, the QSDFT model showed the best accuracy. Crucially, we established a distinctive rank-dependent pore geometry selection framework: for low-and medium-rank coal, cylindrical-pore-based QSDFT is recommended, while for high-rank coal, a hybrid slit-cylindrical model is essential. This approach effectively eliminates artifacts caused by surface roughness, providing a more rigorous basis for coalbed methane migration studies. Under QSDFT, the low-and medium-rank coals showed a bimodal distribution (1–2 and 5-35 nm). In high-rank coal, micropores (2-5 nm) formed the primary peak, whereas mesopores were broadly distributed. QSDFT provides a reliable theoretical and quantitative basis for coalbed methane migration studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.