Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Feasibility and application of an adsorption model for coal pore structure analysis through N

Jikun Liu, Dongliang Xu, Lanhua Zhao, Jingdan Qiao, Zerun Chang, Cuixia Wang, Yu Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jikun LiuCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Middle Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Dongliang XuCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Middle Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Lanhua ZhaoCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Middle Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Jingdan QiaoCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Middle Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Zerun ChangCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Middle Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Cuixia WangCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Middle Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China. 474525043@qq.com.
Yu ShiCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Middle Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52204235Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province No. 2025JC-YBMS-491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pore structure of coal critically influences the occurrence and migration of coalbed methane. Low-temperature nitrogen adsorption (LTNA) is a key method for characterizing the properties of coal pores. However, the accuracy of experimental data directly determines model precision. In this study, LTNA experiments were conducted on six coal samples with varying degrees of metamorphism. The adsorption models were evaluated using residual and root-mean-square error analyses. The results showed that low- and medium-rank coals exhibited type-IV isotherms, indicating bottleneck-shaped mesopores. By contrast, higher-rank coal yielded type-II isotherms, suggesting a predominance of micropores. Unlike traditional methods that assume ideal smooth pore walls, this study systematically applies the Quenched Solid Density Functional Theory (QSDFT) to address the inherent heterogeneity and multiscale nature of coal reservoirs. Among the models, the QSDFT model showed the best accuracy. Crucially, we established a distinctive rank-dependent pore geometry selection framework: for low-and medium-rank coal, cylindrical-pore-based QSDFT is recommended, while for high-rank coal, a hybrid slit-cylindrical model is essential. This approach effectively eliminates artifacts caused by surface roughness, providing a more rigorous basis for coalbed methane migration studies. Under QSDFT, the low-and medium-rank coals showed a bimodal distribution (1–2 and 5-35 nm). In high-rank coal, micropores (2-5 nm) formed the primary peak, whereas mesopores were broadly distributed. QSDFT provides a reliable theoretical and quantitative basis for coalbed methane migration studies.

Indexed as

Coal poresLow-temperature nitrogen adsorption experimentsPore shapeQSDFT model

Identifiers

PMID41781543
PMCPMC13068894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.